澳洲阿德莱德大学商法课程范文
时间:2020-10-14 17:48 作者:EssayPhD
Commercial Law I是澳洲阿德莱德大学法学院本科基础课程，该课程主要澳洲法律系统中的关键构成和特质，以及介绍了商业活动的应该遵循的基本法律原则，包括合同的相关事宜、消费者权益保护、侵权行为定责等等:
This course introduces students to the key features, institutions and principles of the Australian legal system, including the roles of the Constitution, parliaments and the courts. The course also exposes students to the basic rules of commercial law including: the formation, performance and termination of a contract; consumer guarantees; the tort of negligence; liability for unsafe products, misleading conduct and abuse of power; discussion of various legal structures used to operate a business ; and an introduction to ecommerce issues.
在这个课程中，assignment占据了35%的课程分数，是不容忽视的C位。首先我们来看作业要求：
Assignment Question
You are required to advise each of the parties for the legal disputes that have arisen from the
“Background facts” below, and briefly outline how a judge would decide the issues in dispute.
我们来看这个sample是如何回答的，并结合老师的建议，如何在这个sample上进一步提升。
首先，sample里为当事方概述的论点非常简略，在实际作答时，预计有些论点会需要详细表述，特别是用来支持论点的法律条款或以往案例。在sample中，以往案例基本只提到案例的名字，通常可以简要说明案例的事实、案例的判决和所依据的原则。
其次，sample中，judge’s decision是故意留空的，这并不意味着这部分就不需要写，虽然分数占比不多。judge’s decision通常就是判决结果，加上结果的依据。请注意，法官在决定法律纠纷时当然要以公正感和常识为指导，所以你也应该如此。
以下是这篇sample
This course introduces students to the key features, institutions and principles of the Australian legal system, including the roles of the Constitution, parliaments and the courts. The course also exposes students to the basic rules of commercial law including: the formation, performance and termination of a contract; consumer guarantees; the tort of negligence; liability for unsafe products, misleading conduct and abuse of power; discussion of various legal structures used to operate a business ; and an introduction to ecommerce issues.
在这个课程中，assignment占据了35%的课程分数，是不容忽视的C位。首先我们来看作业要求：
Assignment Question
You are required to advise each of the parties for the legal disputes that have arisen from the
“Background facts” below, and briefly outline how a judge would decide the issues in dispute.
我们来看这个sample是如何回答的，并结合老师的建议，如何在这个sample上进一步提升。
首先，sample里为当事方概述的论点非常简略，在实际作答时，预计有些论点会需要详细表述，特别是用来支持论点的法律条款或以往案例。在sample中，以往案例基本只提到案例的名字，通常可以简要说明案例的事实、案例的判决和所依据的原则。
其次，sample中，judge’s decision是故意留空的，这并不意味着这部分就不需要写，虽然分数占比不多。judge’s decision通常就是判决结果，加上结果的依据。请注意，法官在决定法律纠纷时当然要以公正感和常识为指导，所以你也应该如此。
以下是这篇sample