这是EssayPhD论文代写团队帮英国谢菲尔德的学弟做的一篇construction law代写范文。本文讨论的主题是缺陷工程的损害赔偿措施。无过错方有权要求损害赔偿。但是赔偿的程度怎么规定，按照什么原则来定义损害，划定赔偿是本来将要探讨的问题。以下是construction law代写范文。

The issue here is the measure of damages for the defective works. The innocent party has the right to claim damages for breach of contract. Bellgrove breached the contract by providing defective works for Eldridge and should make compensations to her. The key issue is to what extent the damages would be awarded, i.e. the measure of damage. Bellgrove suggested the measurement of damages according to the difference between the value of the building and the price of the original construction contract. However, Eldridge claimed the cost of reinstatement as the measure of damage.

在body部分通过运用相关的法律和案例进行扩充的描述，指出对于有缺陷的工程，通常的补救措施是根据建筑合同完成工程的成本，按照实际或估计需要恢复的费用来判定的。

For defective works, the usual remedy is the cost of completing the works in according to the building contract. The measure of damages will be actual or estimated cost of reinstatement necessary. Due to the substantial defect, the court held that the building would be better demolished and then the measure of damages was the cost of demolition and reconstruction of the works.

文章conclusion部分，根据前文的描述和观点，给出最终的结论，指出在合同法的历史上，违约评估损害赔偿的原则并没有改变。损害赔偿的主要目的是将受害方恢复到原本应有的状态。在执行施工合同时，最重要的是按照计划和规范进行施工，以避免潜在风险带来的不必要的损失。

The principles of assessing damages with regard to breach of contract have not been changed in the history of contract law. The main purpose of damages is to restore the injured party to the position that he should have been in. In performing construction contracts, the most important thing is to build the works in accordance with the plans and specifications to avoid potential defects and damages.

由于篇幅限制和客户要求，我们只节选文章中一小部分进行展示。需要construction law代写的同学欢迎联系我们。